Search String Builder
Turn a topic or PICO into an editable search draft for 12 database interfaces, with concept groups, vocabulary checks and adaptation notes.
Describe your search
Input is sent to our generation service and OpenAI. Candidate MeSH terms are sent to NLM. The latest strategy and edits are saved in this tab’s session storage. Avoid confidential information. Failed generations do not consume a run.
Continue your research in AnswerThis
Copy or download your draft first, then open AnswerThis and start your search manually. Your draft is not transferred.
How to use Search String Builder
- Choose Topic or PICO and describe the central research concepts.
- Select the exact database interface and generate a concept strategy.
- Review the synonyms, heading status and adaptation notes; edit the string as needed.
- Copy the query into the database, test known papers and record the executed search.
What to check
- Check synonyms against relevant papers, including regional spelling and terminology.
- Confirm each suggested heading in the correct vocabulary and review its narrower terms.
- Test known relevant records and inspect the actual executed query.
- Record database, interface, coverage, limits, search date and result count.
Build concepts before choosing syntax
A search strategy is more than a list of keywords. It groups alternative expressions of one idea with OR, then connects the essential ideas with AND. For a question about exercise in adults with hypertension, one block might cover hypertension and related wording while another covers exercise and physical activity. A comparison with usual care may define eligibility without being searchable consistently. An outcome such as systolic blood pressure can improve specificity, but adding it as a mandatory block can also exclude studies whose abstracts describe outcomes differently.
For example, begin with hypertension OR high blood pressure OR hypertensive, then a separate exercise OR physical activity OR training block. These alternatives illustrate the grouping method, not a complete search for every exercise review. The generated list should be compared with terminology in relevant records before you choose its final scope.
The builder first proposes two to four labelled groups from your topic or PICO fields. It supplies free-text synonyms, candidate controlled headings and optional proximity phrases in a structured strategy. Regional spelling, plural or adjective forms and common abbreviations can help recover papers written with different terminology. Review every addition: a short abbreviation can have several meanings, and an apparently related term can change the population or intervention. The concept table lets you inspect this reasoning before trusting a long query.
Free-text searching and controlled vocabulary solve different problems. Free text can find new, unindexed or unusually described records. A controlled heading can bring together records indexed under a common concept, including narrower headings when exploded. The vocabularies are distinct collections: a MeSH label is not proof that an identically worded Emtree or CINAHL heading exists. The NLM check verifies candidate MeSH labels and descriptor IDs only. All other heading suggestions need confirmation inside the destination thesaurus; no proprietary thesaurus content is copied into a local catalogue.
Adapt across interfaces without claiming identical retrieval
The database menu names the host as well as the collection because query grammar belongs to an interface. MEDLINE via Ovid uses Ovid fields and adjacency; PubMed uses NLM tags. Embase.com differs from Ovid Embase. The same Boolean concept structure can be adapted, but fields such as title/abstract, topic and title/abstract/keywords do not cover identical metadata. Proximity operators also differ in direction, distance counting and treatment of punctuation. The builder reports those differences instead of substituting one final string into another.
Try another database after generation to see its compiled draft immediately. This does not call the model or consume a free run. Your manual edits remain associated with that interface, while Reset to generated restores its compiler output. Google Scholar is a special case: its limited search surface receives a shortened adaptation, with a conservative length cap and an explicit warning. Use separate searches for omitted alternatives, and do not present that shortened query as a lossless translation of a database strategy.
Review and preserve the search you actually ran
Treat the generated strategy as an AI-assisted draft for reviewer confirmation. A well-formed Boolean expression can still miss a field’s preferred terminology, retrieve the wrong meaning of an abbreviation, or make an unnecessary outcome mandatory. Start with a small set of known relevant papers. Check whether each paper would be retrieved by the population and intervention blocks separately, then by the combined strategy. If a paper is missed, inspect its title, abstract and indexing to find the cause before adding more synonyms. More terms are useful only when they represent the intended concept.
Keep eligibility criteria separate from search constraints. A language restriction, human-study filter or study-design filter can remove recent or incompletely indexed records. Apply only justified limits using the destination interface controls, and record exactly what you selected. The saved concept strategy can carry structured limits and exclusions, but unsupported settings appear as adaptation notes and are not silently applied. Excluding records with NOT deserves particular care: a relevant study can mention the excluded population or treatment in its background.
Copy or download the edited query after testing it. Keep a search log alongside the plain-text export with the database and host, coverage segment, vocabulary release where available, date and time, exact executed string, selected filters, result count and platform warnings. The generated text alone is not a complete reproducibility record. Session storage keeps this tab’s draft and interface edits, but it is not a permanent project archive. Ask a librarian or information specialist to review a consequential review search before final execution; this tool does not certify recall, precision or methodological adequacy.
A complete starting query to inspect
PubMed: (hypertension[tiab] OR "high blood pressure"[tiab] OR hypertensive[tiab]) AND (exercise[tiab] OR "physical activity"[tiab] OR training[tiab])
Scopus: TITLE-ABS-KEY(hypertension OR "high blood pressure" OR hypertensive) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY(exercise OR "physical activity" OR training)
These free-text examples show the same two concepts in different interfaces. They are starting points, not validated searches. In PubMed inspect Search Details and phrase warnings; in Scopus test field scope, phrase and proximity behavior. Add only relevant, reviewed vocabulary and record filters after execution.
Frequently asked questions
Should I enter a topic or PICO?
Use Topic for a plain-language description. PICO separates population and intervention/exposure from optional comparison and outcome. The draft selects two to four concepts; it does not force every supplied field into an AND block. A narrow comparator or poorly indexed outcome can hide relevant studies.
Which exact interfaces are supported?
PubMed (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov); MEDLINE via Ovid; Embase via Embase.com; Scopus; Web of Science Core Collection; CINAHL via EBSCOhost; APA PsycINFO via EBSCOhost; ERIC (eric.ed.gov); IEEE Xplore; ACM Digital Library; Cochrane CENTRAL via Cochrane Library Search Manager; Google Scholar (simplified adaptation with warning). MEDLINE here means Ovid, Embase means Embase.com, and CINAHL/PsycINFO mean EBSCOhost. ERIC means the free eric.ed.gov site. CENTRAL means Cochrane Library Search Manager. Other hosts need a different adaptation.
Are controlled-vocabulary suggestions verified?
Only MeSH candidates are checked against the official NLM descriptor lookup. Verified means a descriptor label and ID exist, not that the heading fits your question. Emtree, CINAHL Headings, APA Thesaurus and ERIC Descriptors are always suggested, unverified because no live lookup is available. If NLM is down, the strategy is retained with a warning that MeSH verification was unavailable.
Does switching databases use another run?
No. The saved concept strategy is compiled in your browser. Each interface has its own editable string; changing one does not rewrite the concepts or another database’s output. Reset to generated removes the manual edit for the current interface. A new Generate replaces the strategy and its edits.
Does this run or validate the search?
No. Copy the draft to the named interface, review platform warnings, and run it yourself. Limits are listed for manual application rather than silently translated. These syntax adapters have not been tested in live database sessions. Google Scholar receives a shortened adaptation with reduced concepts/synonyms and a warning; it is not an equivalent systematic search.
How many free runs are included?
This tool includes 3 successful free runs per browser. Failed requests and copying or downloading an existing result do not use another run. The hub, PubMed and Scopus pages share this allowance; changing databases is also free.
What happens when I sign up?
Signup opens the AnswerThis app. It does not unlock more runs on this page or transfer your draft. Copy or download your result first.